Keytah System Comparison
Keytah System Comparison
Since 2009 the Keytah System Comparison trial has been gathering comprehensive and insightful data to benefit the industry as a whole. Data collected during the 2009-2010, 2011-2012, 2013-2014, 2015-2016 and most recently 2017-2018 has proven extremely valuable. This 2020-2021 season will see significantly more research into automated irrigation with both a new bankless channel setup, a new Environode Farm Automation Controller (EFAC) for the Smart Siphons and a new surface drip setup.
Updating the Drip System: During 2017-2018 significant investment was made updating the filter setup for the drip system.
It is essential that any drip system has suitable pumping and filter capacity to meet peak crop water demand.
For the 2020-2021 season the drip field has been fitted with new surface drip tape. The system utilises the existing pump and filter set up, but instead of sub surface tape it utilises surface tape which is replaces each season. The tape is easily installed and fully recyclable.
Automation of Siphons: The Smart Siphons were installed in 2017, they are a small pipe through bank, fitted with a rotating elbow, and enable up to 150 siphons to be started at once remotely. Automated control of the siphons is utilising the EnviroNode IoT solution. The EnviroNode Hub provides wireless control of siphons, sensors and monitors the channel level and water advance sensors in the field. The EFAC (EnviroNode Farm Automation Controller) enables the smart siphons to be started or stopped remotely via the EnviroDash from any web enabled mobile device.
New Bankless Channel Field: Many irrigators have moved to bankless channel systems to help managed labour resourcing. The trial is continuing to collect data from the existing bankless channel field, and will also collect information on a new larger setup. The new W567 is a large 500ha system that has three sets of five bays. Water is reused as it progresses through the five bays in each set. Reusing water through the bays reduced the tail water that has to be returned to the storage. This bankless setup has been fitted with automated gates which will enable remote control of irrigation.
As the season progresses we will provide updates on how each of the automation systems are going. We will also be hosting our annual GVIA field day to give growers an opportunity to see the field activities of the project and to discuss the findings. This season the field day is scheduled to be held at Keytah on Wednesday the 10th of February 2021. For each of our annual field days we develop brochures providing the relevant information for growers. Download your copies of the 2018 brochure on Grower-led irrigation automation and nitrogen optimisation or the siphon-less irrigation 2019 brochure.
The project is one of the many grower led optimised irrigation site that are a feature of Smarter Irrigation for Profit 2. The specific intention is to collect relevant commercial data and to provide growers confidence in how new and innovative irrigation technology can fit into their operations. See why growers see this as important.
During the project, the Gross Production Water Use Index (GPWUI) was calculated for each of the systems. The GPWUI is used to enable a
comparison of the systems across years and across farms. It combines total seasonal water use (irrigation water and rainfall) with soil
moisture and yield. The higher the GPWUI the more water efficient the crop.
The most important finding is that the greatest differences in GPWUI and yield are between years, not between systems. Results show significant variation in the GPWUI between years principally due to climatic conditions. Each of the seasons have been very different, from cool and wet, to hot and dry, with one season where there was no irrigation or rainfall to finish the crop. We have an inherently variable climate so choosing a system that allows your to manage the variability on your farm is critical.
The 2017-2018 season produced the highest yield for each of the four systems, with the bankless channel system the strongest performer yielding 14.8 bale/Ha and having a GPWUI of 1.29 bales/ML. Both the siphon and the lateral also performed strongly with yields of 14.9 bales/ha and 14.6 bales/ha respectively. The GPWUI results for both siphon and lateral were also good at 1.25 and 1.32 bales/ML.
The five year average has shown the lateral move to have the highest average yield of 12.75 bales/ha and GPWUI of 1.30bales/ML. The bankless channel had the second highest average yield of 12.52 bales/ha and GPWUI of 1.26bales/ML.
Irrigation system choices consider yield and water use efficiency, as well as the labour resourcing needs and the energy requirements of the systems. Many cotton growing regions have low reliability of irrigation water and this will also impact decision making. Growers are also considering how they can automate irrigation to further improve the efficiency of all these inputs. Automation of irrigation is one of the focus areas of Smarter Irrigation for Profit 2 and in 2020-2021 the Keytah site will be part of this focus. Automation has several benefits; it improves labour resourcing and enables more timely and uniform applications. Automation is possible with all four of the keytah systems, the drip and lateral systems can readily be automated. The siphon field has been fitted with Smart Siphons controlled by EnviroNode Farm Automation Control (EFAC) and the Bankless Channel is fitted with Padmann Stops Bankless Channel Bay Outlets fitted with Auto-winches enabling remote irrigation
The siphon field had significantly higher labour requirements, but along with the bankless channel it had very low operating energy costs.
In contrast, both the pressurised systems, the lateral and drip, had high operating energy costs. These two systems also had high capital
As labour resourcing is becoming more difficult, especially in the more remote areas the 2017-2018 expanded to evaluate the practical constraints of installation, management, reliability and suitability of automation of flood irrigation.
The siphon field was fitted with small pipes through the bank attached to Smart Siphons. Capital set-up costs for the smart siphon will be significantly influenced by field specifications and installation process adopted. Details from the findings this year are being updated into a technical report and brochure which will be available on line in the near future.
In the mean time, the following links will take you to the 2016 brochure, the 2018 report and the video which provide more detail on the project.
During the 2017-2018 season the project trialled a telemetry and smart siphon management system managed with an EnviroNode Hub a platform developed for customisation. There was an ultrasonic wireless water level sensor installed in the head ditch and capacity for water advance sensors. The project also enabled the trial of a customised mobile device web App, which was provided initially with a display of current and graphed water levels, a display of the smart siphon system status and a capacity to download data.
The project has shown that although important, water alone is not the only driver growers must consider when making decisions on irrigation
systems. The reliability and the potential yield achievable under each of the systems are key considerations for growers. In areas where
there is low reliability of water capital costs will be critical, as will labour resourcing, energy costs, maintenance and servicing. This
project provides growers a detailed data set to inform their irrigation infrastructure investment decisions.
The trial has been well received by growers and industry since its inception, with data continually enhancing grower’s capacity, knowledge and understanding of the efficiencies of alternative irrigation systems.
Many growers have altered their irrigation systems following a visit to Keytah, or from discussions with people involved in the project, which is an extremely pleasing adoption rate.